Adh-Dhahabi: Difference between revisions

From MedNub
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[pp. 505-506]'''
'''[pp. 505-506]'''


ADH-DHAHABI
ADH-DHAHABĪ


(1274-1348 A.D.)
(1274-1348 A.D.)
Line 9: Line 9:
EI (s.v.); GAL 2, 46.
EI (s.v.); GAL 2, 46.


1.) Al-mushtabih fī asmā’ ar-rijāl (A Dictionary of Homonyms)
1.) ''Al-mushtabih fī asmā’ ar-rijāl'' (A Dictionary of Homonyms)


Ed.: P. de Jong, Leiden Ι881.
Ed.: P. de Jong, Leiden Ι881.
Line 15: Line 15:
T.: de Jong A:0
T.: de Jong A:0


2.) Ta'rīkh al-Islam (A Chronicle, later continued by Ibn Shubba down to 1403 A.D.).
2.) ''Ta'rīkh al-Islām'' (A Chronicle, later continued by Ibn Shubba down to 1403 A.D.).


Quotations in: Ta'rīkh ad-dawla al-fatimiyya by Ḥasan Ibrahim Ḥasan, Cairo 1964.
Quotations in: ''Ta'rīkh ad-dawla al-fatimiyya'' by Ḥasan Ibrahim Ḥasan, Cairo 1964.


T.: Ḥasan Ibrahim A: 0
T.: Ḥasan Ibrahim A: 0


'''[p. 506]''' 1.) from Al-Mushtabih
'''[p. 506]''' 1.) from ''Al-Mushtabih''


''Αn-Nūbī''. ''An-nūbah'' is a large country of the sūdān, south of Upper Egypt. It is said that from that country came Bilāl - may God be pleased with him! - and Hibatalla b. Muḥammad b. Nūbī al-Anbārī (another reading: Hibatalla b. Aḥmed b. Nūbah, the Nubian). This information comes from Abū-l-Ḥasan b. al-'Allaf and Abū Naṣr 'Abd as-Samid b. Aḥmad b. Muḥ. an-Nūbī, according to the testimony given by Ibn Kulayb (Hibatalla) died at a mature age in the year 625 H. [1227 A.D.]. (de Jong, p. 63).
''Αn-Nūbī''. ''An-nūbah'' is a large country of the ''Sūdān'', south of Upper Egypt. It is said that from that country came Bilāl - may God be pleased with him! - and Hibatalla b. Muḥammad b. Nūbī al-Anbārī [another reading: Hibatalla b. Aḥmed b. Nūba, the Nubian]. This information comes from Abū-l-Ḥasan b. al-'Allaf and Abū Naṣr 'Abd as-Samid b. Aḥmad b. Muḥ. an-Nūbī, according to the testimony given by Ibn Kulayb [Hibatalla] died at a mature age in the year 625 H. [1227 A.D.]. (de Jong, p. 63).


2.) From Tarīkh al-Islām
2.) From ''Tarīkh al-Islām''


In this year (572 H. = 1176 A.D.), the battle of Al-Kanz took place. He was the leader of the Blacks (''sūdān'') in Upper Egypt. He rallied a great multitude around him and they marched on Cairo (''al-Qāhira'') with the intention of restoring the (Fatimid) dynasty ... Al-Kanz was slain together with a great number of his followers. It is said that the number of those slain was 80,000, according to Muẓaffar Qīzoghlū. (Ḥasan Ibrahim, p. 197).
In this year [572 H. = 1176 A.D.], the battle of al-Kanz took place. He was the leader of the Blacks (''sūdān'') in Upper Egypt. He rallied a great multitude around him and they marched on Cairo (''al-Qāhira'') with the intention of restoring the [Fatimid] dynasty ... Al-Kanz was slain together with a great number of his followers. It is said that the number of those slain was 80,000, according to Muẓaffar Qīzoghlū. (Ḥasan Ibrahim, p. 197).


(Adh-Dhahabī quoting Ibn Abī Ṭay): The Turks received their salaries very punctually. We can say that the Turks rose against the Caliph (al-Mustansir) - who was then helpless - because of their thirst for bloodshed against the Black soldiers (''al-junūd as-sūdānīyyīn''), whom they hated (''al-makrūhīn lahom''). (The reason for it was that the Black soldiers) were faithful supporters (''ansār'') of the mother of the Caliph and used to take from the booty whatever they liked, while the Turks could collect only the remainder (lit. = "what the circumstances allowed"). (Ḥasan Ibrahim, p. 553).
[Adh-Dhahabī quoting Ibn Abī Ṭayy]: The Turks received their salaries very punctually. We can say that the Turks rose against the Caliph [al-Mustanṣir] - who was then helpless - because of their thirst for bloodshed against the Black soldiers (''al-junūd as-sūdānīyyīn''), whom they hated (''al-makrūhīn lahum''). [The reason for it was that the Black soldiers] were faithful supporters (''ansār'') of the mother of the Caliph and used to take from the booty whatever they liked, while the Turks could collect only the remainder [lit. = "what the circumstances allowed"]. (Ḥasan Ibrahim, p. 553).


[[Category:Literary Sources]]
[[Category:Literary Sources]]

Revision as of 13:33, 17 February 2015

[pp. 505-506]

ADH-DHAHABĪ

(1274-1348 A.D.)

Abū 'Abdalla Muḥ. b. 'Uthmān b. Qāīmaz Shams ad-dīn Adh-Dhahabī at-Turkumānī. An historian from Damascus, mostly concerned with the Hadith traditions.

EI (s.v.); GAL 2, 46.

1.) Al-mushtabih fī asmā’ ar-rijāl (A Dictionary of Homonyms)

Ed.: P. de Jong, Leiden Ι881.

T.: de Jong A:0

2.) Ta'rīkh al-Islām (A Chronicle, later continued by Ibn Shubba down to 1403 A.D.).

Quotations in: Ta'rīkh ad-dawla al-fatimiyya by Ḥasan Ibrahim Ḥasan, Cairo 1964.

T.: Ḥasan Ibrahim A: 0

[p. 506] 1.) from Al-Mushtabih

Αn-Nūbī. An-nūbah is a large country of the Sūdān, south of Upper Egypt. It is said that from that country came Bilāl - may God be pleased with him! - and Hibatalla b. Muḥammad b. Nūbī al-Anbārī [another reading: Hibatalla b. Aḥmed b. Nūba, the Nubian]. This information comes from Abū-l-Ḥasan b. al-'Allaf and Abū Naṣr 'Abd as-Samid b. Aḥmad b. Muḥ. an-Nūbī, according to the testimony given by Ibn Kulayb [Hibatalla] died at a mature age in the year 625 H. [1227 A.D.]. (de Jong, p. 63).

2.) From Tarīkh al-Islām

In this year [572 H. = 1176 A.D.], the battle of al-Kanz took place. He was the leader of the Blacks (sūdān) in Upper Egypt. He rallied a great multitude around him and they marched on Cairo (al-Qāhira) with the intention of restoring the [Fatimid] dynasty ... Al-Kanz was slain together with a great number of his followers. It is said that the number of those slain was 80,000, according to Muẓaffar Qīzoghlū. (Ḥasan Ibrahim, p. 197).

[Adh-Dhahabī quoting Ibn Abī Ṭayy]: The Turks received their salaries very punctually. We can say that the Turks rose against the Caliph [al-Mustanṣir] - who was then helpless - because of their thirst for bloodshed against the Black soldiers (al-junūd as-sūdānīyyīn), whom they hated (al-makrūhīn lahum). [The reason for it was that the Black soldiers] were faithful supporters (ansār) of the mother of the Caliph and used to take from the booty whatever they liked, while the Turks could collect only the remainder [lit. = "what the circumstances allowed"]. (Ḥasan Ibrahim, p. 553).